Home

Transit in the United States

Total Federal Assistance (Capital and Operating) Applied to Transit and Unlinked Passenger Trips

Concepts

Federal funds applied to transit are Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Program funds (financial assistance used to offset operating costs and pay for capital projects) and other Federal funds.

Unlinked passenger trips are the number of patrons boarding public transportation vehicles.

Comments

Ridership (*) increased by 20.3 percent from 1989 to 2008. During the same period, Federal assistance applied to transit increased by nearly 60 percent (constant 2000 dollars).

 

Figure 1: Federal Funds Applied to Transit 1989 – 2008

Line Chart Federal Funds Applied to Transit 1989 – 2008

Figure 2: Unlinked Passenger Trips 1989 – 2008

Line Chart Unlinked Passenger Trips 1989 – 2008

(*) Note: Unlinked passenger trips were adjusted for all years prior to 2007 to correct a bias reported by a large heavy rail operator.

Number of Transit Agencies

Concepts

Transit agencies that receive or benefit from Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Program funds (capital or operating) are required to report selected transit data to the National Transit Database (NTD) program. In addition, transit agencies not receiving FTA funds are encouraged to submit data, providing a more complete picture of public transit throughout the United States. These transit agencies report financial (capital and operating) data and non-financial operating statistics by transit mode. A total of 694 transit agencies reported data in 2008.

Comments

The number of bus systems increased in the last 10 years (67 new systems).

Demand response increased by nearly 15 percent (61 new systems) over the same period, reflecting the need to continue providing special transit service for elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities.

Vanpool increased by 55 percent (22 new systems) during the 10 year period.

Figure 3: Number of Agencies Reporting by Mode 2007 – 2008

Line Chart Number of Agencies Reporting by Mode 2007 – 2008

 

Figure 4: Number of Agencies Reporting by Mode 1999 – 2008

Bar Chart Number of Agencies Reporting by Mode 1999 – 2008

Table 1: Number of Agencies Reporting by Year by Mode between 1999 - 2008

Year

Bus *

Demand Response *

Vanpool *

Heavy Rail

Commuter Rail

Light Rail

Other Modes *

1999

437

413

40

14

18

20

33

2000

433

416

42

14

20

21

31

2001

448

432

43

14

21

23

31

2002

456

423

42

14

19

23

31

2003

463

433

47

14

19

25

31

2004

471

441

43

14

19

27

31

2005

476

449

51

15

20

27

30

2006

491

464

52

15

20

27

28

2007

497

473

57

15

21

26

30

2008

504

474

62

15

22

29

34

Actual Change

67

61

22

1

4

9

1

(*) Data does not include agencies receiving nine or fewer vehicles waiver.

Vehicle Revenue Miles

Concepts

Vehicle revenue miles are the miles a transit vehicle travels while in revenue service. A transit vehicle is in revenue service when the vehicle is available to the public with the expectation of carrying passengers. Passengers pay full fares, reduced fares (senior citizen, student, special ride fares, etc.), or provide payment through some contractual agreement.

Deadhead travel is not included in vehicle revenue miles. Deadhead mileage consists of the miles a transit vehicle travels while not in revenue service (leaving or returning to the garage or yard or changing routes).

Comments

Vehicle revenue miles increased by nearly 25.2 percent between 1999 and 2008 over all modes. Modes showing the most significant growth are those that had an increase in the number of systems in operation during the period.

Light rail – 4.9 percent

Demand response – 6.7 percent

Vanpool – 22.7 percent

Figure 5: Vehicle Revenue Miles by Mode 2007 – 2008 (Millions)

Bar Chart Vehicle Revenue Miles by Mode 2007 – 2008 (Millions)

Figure 6: Vehicle Revenue Miles by Mode 1999 – 2008 (Millions)

Bar Chart Vehicle Revenue Miles by Mode 1999 – 2008 (Millions)

 

Table 2: Vehicle Revenue Miles (Millions) 1999 - 2008

Year

Vehicle Revenue Miles (Millions)

Year

Vehicle Revenue Miles (Millions)

1999

3,111

2004

3,548

2000

3,202

2005

3,602

2001

3,319

2006

3,671

2002

3,427

2007

3,769

2003

3,476

2008

3,894

 

 

% Change

25.2

Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode

Comments

Ridership increased by over 18 percent from 1999 to 2008.

Figure 7: Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode 2007 – 2008 (Millions)

Bar Chart Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode 2007 – 2008 (Millions)

(*) 2006 data adjusted to correct a bias reported by a large heavy rail operator.


Figure 8: Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode 1999 – 2008 (Millions)

Bar Chart Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode 1999 – 2008 (Millions)

Distribution of Vehicle Revenue Miles and Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode

The share of vehicle revenue miles for demand response has decreased from slightly more than 17.7 percent in 1999 to 13.4 percent in 2008 while the share of vehicle revenue miles for bus increased from 50 percent to 55 percent.

At the same time, the share of unlinked passenger trips for demand response remained below 1 percent, illustrating the low capacity nature of this service, while the share of unlinked passenger trips for bus decreased from 59 percent in 1999 to 53 percent in 2008.

Figure 9: Distribution of Vehicle Revenue Miles – 1999

Figure 10: Distribution of Vehicle Revenue Miles – 2008

Pie Chart Distribution of Vehicle Revenue Miles – 1999

Pie Chart Distribution of Vehicle Revenue Miles – 2008

 

Figure 11: Distribution of Unlinked Passenger Trips – 1999

Figure 12: Distribution of Unlinked Passenger Trips – 2008

Pie Chart Distribution of Unlinked Passenger Trips – 1999

Pie Chart Distribution of Unlinked Passenger Trips – 2008

(*) 1998 data adjusted to correct a bias reported by a large heavy rail operator.

Relative Impact on Data by UZA Size Group

Concepts

Urbanized areas (as defined by the U.S. Census) are geographic areas with a population of 50,000 or more. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, there are 465 urbanized areas. For National Transit Database purposes, the NTST groups urbanized areas by three size categories:

Comments

National Transit Database data are highly concentrated in large urbanized areas. The reported data most heavily concentrated in large urbanized areas are:

Figure 13: Relative Impact of the Data by UZA Size Group – 2008

Bar Chart Relative Impact of the Data by UZA Size Group – 2008

Rural Transit

Concepts

Rural areas are, by US Census definition, areas with a population of less than 50,000. Because these areas may be quite large, rural areas usually have low population density. For report year 2008, 1,391 sub recipients (including 54 intercity bus subrecipients) submitted data to the NTD through their State Departments of Transportation incorporating data for 2,298 out of 3,162 counties nationwide.

Types of service in the Rural module correspond to the modes included in the Annual (urban, over 50,000 population) module but bus is broken down into four categories (fixed route, deviated fixed route, fixed and deviated and private intercity bus service). For definitions of modes and types of service refer to the NTD Glossary available at www.NTDprogram.gov.

Comments

Due to the low population density of rural areas, types of service such as demand response and bus – deviated fixed route are the most common in rural transit and accounted for 79 percent of all rural service in 2008.

Figure 14: Types of Rural Service – 2008

Pie Chart Types of Rural Service – 2008

Operating and Capital Funding - Rural

Concepts

Sources of funds (operating and capital) include assistance (local, state and federal and funds generated by the service providers (fares and contract revenues).

FTA funding categories available for Rural Transit are:

Comments

Rural transit operating budgets required 71 percent from federal, state and local assistance, and 29 percent from directly generated funds.

Rural transit capital budgets relied mostly on Federal assistance, accounting for nearly two-thirds of all capital applied.

Figure 15: Sources of Operating Funding – 2008

Figure 16: Sources of Capital Funding – 2008

Pie Chart Sources of Operating Funding – 2008

Pie Chart Sources of Capital Funding – 2008

Service Supplied and Consumed

Table 3: Rural Service Supplied and Consumed - 2008

Fare Revenues (Millions)

$86.9

Operating Expenses (Millions)

$1,110.1

Unlinked Passenger Trips (Millions)

110.9

Vehicle Miles (Millions)

477.6

Vehicle Hours (Millions)

31

Operating Expenses per Vehicle Mile

$2.3

Operating Expenses per Vehicle Hour

$35.8

Operating Expenses per Unlinked Passenger Trip

$10

Recovery Ratio (Fare Revenues per Operating Expense)

8%

Rural performance measures are typical of service provided in low density areas such as low recovery ratios, and high cost per trip among others.

 

Table 4: Rural Safety
 
Total Number of Subrecipients
Safety Incidents
Average Safety Incidents per Subrecipient

Major Incidents

1,414

1,149

.81

Major Injuries

1,414

273

.19

Fatalities

1,414

20

.0014

Back to top